Skip to main content

The psychology of social media & its social environment

For one of my units i am to explore and create work based on the theme "Environment". 

Brain storming and mind mapping i decided that i wanted to use social media as  an idea of our digital, social environment.

I am starting my research by looking into the physiology behind social media use.I would say now, in many ways the Internet has become the backbone of society in most countries because the number of users it is constantly growing, and because of this marketers and advertisers seek to get noticed by social media users that love to network. Hence creating an entirely new environment inside an invisible world. 

But why do people obsess over using social media? Well apparently using social media causes oxytocin levels to rise in the brain.  If that is true then it is addictive. Oxyticin is known as the love hormone because it is released when people cuddle or bond socially.  

One web sight i looked at claimed that research shows that people devote about 30–40% of all speech to talking about themselves. But over social media, these numbers increase to about 80% of posts. The reason for this is because socializing in person demands more emotional and physical contribution.

Have we become more emotionally detached from one and other from being so able to contact each other more than ever before? I suppose social media eliminates having to observe body language or read facial expressions, instead we prefer to look at photos and take our time to refine our comments and interact with each other in a more controlled way. 

But using Social media makes us focus on self-presentation.... Where as in person you don't feel the need to do this as much... on facebook, for example, we present ourselves in a way that will increase our self-esteem and confidence... we post the impressive news, the best photos and check into the popular places.
But surely by doing this we then start to compare ourselves to everyone else on out news feed. People bragging about where they have been on Holiday, how well there career is going, relationship statuses... making you feel insecure about yourself and your accomplishments. So when you have nothing to brag about, what do you post? A selfie? why... there is no logic behind why people take selfies of themselves, and lets be honest, they look nothing like the person! i am guilty of this as well. BUT WHY?

Yes its true, self portraits have been around for a long time, I have always thought a portrait of someone, even yourself, was a way to express a human feeling or emotion... But i haven't seen any selfies of someone for example... crying. I think we use selfies as a way to brag. A way to feel good about yourself. In our society being attractive is, in a way an achievement... 
As an example here is two photo i took of my sister, minutes apart. 

All that has changed is the angle and body position. What one do you think is considered in our social media world, more attractive? the better image? The more accepted emotion to present to the world? The one she would keep and be happy to present? The images are not that different, but at the same time, are completely different.

These ideas we have about our appearance in a digital world is, for a lot of people, there whole world. I decided to do some digging around on Instagram and found pages and pages of people who only posted selfies, and got 1,000's of likes and followers because of how they presented themselves online.





And on the other hand we have a person who volunteers to teach children and a group of women who run to raise money for charity. 




So in this world where we give, receive and share approval over our own and other peoples accomplishments in life how do we, or should i say how did we, come to this conclusion of what is worthy of admiration and what is not?. Technology has given us everything we could ever want, but taken everything we really need to thrive in ourselves. It has stolen the ability to feel satisfied because now on screen is someone else, doing more, doing things we feel we could never do and thus making us compare ourselves to them.

I know i need to make digital work, i know i need to respond to this and i know i need to speak about it.
  

Comments

  1. Good observations - could be some great visual mileage in this

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Art & Design Portfolio - Sam Cornwell (Digital)

I decided to start my research on paper based and digital portfolios by first looking at a digital portfolio. One artist who came into the college to do a talk was a photographer called Sam Cornwell, he took us through his digital portfolio. I wanted to think about why his portfolio was digital and not paper based. One of the biggest advantages of a digital portfolio is the accessibility of it. It is easy to send out to employers or people wishing to view it. It is digital so it can easily be send to someone via email or put on a USB and accessed that way. Another reason is unlike a paper based portfolio there is more than one, it is easy to dispatch without spending money on paper to print. It is also instant, you might have to wait a few days for a paper port folio to be sent by mail or spend money on travel to bring it to the person wishing to view it. With a digital portfolio one click and it is sent! I went onto Sam Cornwell's page and found out his portfolio is on his web...

Starting experimenting with photography

After looking into the work of Henry Weston i decided to try and experiment,first, with negative space. It was something that stood out to me a lot in some of his work, as i spoke about in my report. i started by just taking a few pictures as i noticed it around me. I think these are a very interesting start and have a lot of potential, i decided to play around with the editing a bit by cropping them, changing the contrast and making them black and white.  i like this image and i think composition wise it works. i also think it looks good in black and white as it has gotten rid of the chance of clashing colours and sets a different kind of mood. The subject is in focus and it looks quite sharp. I cropped it a little and changed the contrast and exposure.  i prefer this image to the top one as i like the spacing between the feet compared to the first one i think it is more visually pleasing, i also rotated this image just as an experiment. ...

Art wolfe - My world, my view.

Another photographer i decided to look at is called Art Wolfe. Wolfe's work is a combination of Art and journalism, he graduated from the University of Washington with Bachelor’s degrees in fine arts and art education in 1975, since then he has worked on every continent, in hundreds of locations, and on a range of different projects. I started by looking into Wolfe's technique, i found a lot of information on the type of camera he uses (Canon’s 5DS R) and the lenses he uses - "Mostly “L” series lenses, Canon’s professional designation, the 16-35 f/2.8 L II and the 70-200 f/4 L IS. He uses extension tubes for macro work with the 70-200 and adds 1.4x extenders. But i wanted to look into his editing techniques not his equipment, although interesting and worth putting on here for future reference.   I found out Wolfe uses "Photo manipulation" in some of his photographs. Although his photographs are not heavily edited, he uses techniques like cloning the animal...